PLEASE NOTE: This is the Archived Sexyloops Board from years 2004-2013.
Our active community is here: https://www.sexyloops.co.uk/theboard/
Our active community is here: https://www.sexyloops.co.uk/theboard/
Tournament gear measurements - CCS etc. of tournament stuff
Tournament gear measurements - CCS etc. of tournament stuff
Hi,
I'm starting a thread about tournament gear properties. I'm sure it's interesting for John Waters.
--
The first rod I've measured is a
G.Loomis IMX TF116-42
Single hand fly distance
ICSF EV #2
that I've build with Fuji LSG guides.
length: 2,945 m
IP (Test weight for 1/3 length deflection) = 550g
AA = 65°
test weight for 1/15 length deflection = 76.6 g
ERN outside the scale, I'd expect something between 17-20.
mass(tip) = 27.5 g
mass center (tip) = 54 cm from the butt
mass(butt) = 127.2 g
mass center(butt) = 44 cm from the butt
Bye,
Torsten
I'm starting a thread about tournament gear properties. I'm sure it's interesting for John Waters.
--
The first rod I've measured is a
G.Loomis IMX TF116-42
Single hand fly distance
ICSF EV #2
that I've build with Fuji LSG guides.
length: 2,945 m
IP (Test weight for 1/3 length deflection) = 550g
AA = 65°
test weight for 1/15 length deflection = 76.6 g
ERN outside the scale, I'd expect something between 17-20.
mass(tip) = 27.5 g
mass center (tip) = 54 cm from the butt
mass(butt) = 127.2 g
mass center(butt) = 44 cm from the butt
Bye,
Torsten
^^ Warning: The above text contains misspellings, grammatical errors and of course nonsense.
-
- IB3 Member Level 1
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:31 am
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
Thanks Torsten,
Andy is spot on, the ICSF Event 2 has a max line weight of 38 grams. Steve put that blank together quite a few years back now to throw a 42 gram line (USA allowance) but many use the Loomis 42 to cast the 38 gram line today, reflects the trend to stiffer rods.
Be interesting to compare it with other rods used by today's casters.
John
Andy is spot on, the ICSF Event 2 has a max line weight of 38 grams. Steve put that blank together quite a few years back now to throw a 42 gram line (USA allowance) but many use the Loomis 42 to cast the 38 gram line today, reflects the trend to stiffer rods.
Be interesting to compare it with other rods used by today's casters.
John
Hi Torsten
Could you get the loaded frequency profile of that rod? I mean the unloaded frequency and the frequency for a few loads including the one used for the competition line weight?
Many thanks in advance
Merlin
Could you get the loaded frequency profile of that rod? I mean the unloaded frequency and the frequency for a few loads including the one used for the competition line weight?
Many thanks in advance
Merlin
Fly rods are like women, they wont´play if they're maltreated.
Charles Ritz, A Flyfisher's Life
Charles Ritz, A Flyfisher's Life
Hi guys,
You can find some informations about the blank here,
http://www.americancastingassoc.org/our_gam....ist.pdf
--
@ Merlin
I'm not a fan of frequency measurements but I'll see what I can do.
@ John
If you have some data about the CTS blanks, that would be nice too.
Thanks,
Torsten
You can find some informations about the blank here,
http://www.americancastingassoc.org/our_gam....ist.pdf
--
@ Merlin
I'm not a fan of frequency measurements but I'll see what I can do.
@ John
If you have some data about the CTS blanks, that would be nice too.
Thanks,
Torsten
^^ Warning: The above text contains misspellings, grammatical errors and of course nonsense.
-
- IB3 Member Level 1
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 12:54 am
- Contact:
-
- IB3 Member Level 1
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:31 am
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
Hi,
For the T42 blank I've added 45,8 g to the tip to get 85cpm.
I know from my fishing rods that they're in that range, when I'm using the ELN as test weight. Usually setting ERN=ELN results for me in a bit too light shooting head. I like ERN + 1 = ELN, that means for an typical 8wt. I like 30ft. of a DT9 as head.
So the rod is really stiff for the T38 line.
Using the simple recipe ERN+1=ELN, I've extracted a division factor of 10 for the IP, that works well for me.
So in theory the T42 blank should work well with 550g/10 = 55g
Bye,
Torsten
For the T42 blank I've added 45,8 g to the tip to get 85cpm.
I know from my fishing rods that they're in that range, when I'm using the ELN as test weight. Usually setting ERN=ELN results for me in a bit too light shooting head. I like ERN + 1 = ELN, that means for an typical 8wt. I like 30ft. of a DT9 as head.
So the rod is really stiff for the T38 line.
Using the simple recipe ERN+1=ELN, I've extracted a division factor of 10 for the IP, that works well for me.
So in theory the T42 blank should work well with 550g/10 = 55g
Bye,
Torsten
^^ Warning: The above text contains misspellings, grammatical errors and of course nonsense.
-
- IB3 Member Level 1
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:31 am
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
Hi Gents,
It is not a linear but is there a way I can extrapolate ERN on a blank that will not ben to one third of the length. I thought I read somewhere that ERN can be calculated for spinning blanks which this particular fly blank more closely matches than conventional fly blanks. I'm reluctant to to compress this blank anymore than 34 cms, although the blank is 299 cms long. The bend profile is very tip oriented.
Thanks in anticipation,
John
It is not a linear but is there a way I can extrapolate ERN on a blank that will not ben to one third of the length. I thought I read somewhere that ERN can be calculated for spinning blanks which this particular fly blank more closely matches than conventional fly blanks. I'm reluctant to to compress this blank anymore than 34 cms, although the blank is 299 cms long. The bend profile is very tip oriented.
Thanks in anticipation,
John
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest