I'd say it could only be expressed in degrees of rotation, and obviously, in either diagram the arc is either positioned closer or further apart. So what else is new under the sun ? People have been casting both ways for a couple of hundred years
I would have a major effect on how I train instructors.
Paul Arden
Stoatstail50 wrote:Cool....I use degrees for my arcs too....
So, anyway, if the arcs are the same in your diagram but one is longer than the other what is your normal unit of measurement for the length ?
If you meant the length of the arc I suppose whatever works. I don't measure it anyway but I suppose some unit of length. I thought you perhaps meant the length of the lines themselves.
I would have a major effect on how I train instructors.
Paul Arden
OK so to differentiate between these two arcs of the same angle but different length you would say that one is 90 degrees and the other is 90 degrees with a length of X inches or centimetres or something ?
Sure I guess. But overall the way I look at it the length of the stroke is simply the distance the hand moves during the CS. Could be only rotational distance or some combination of rotational and translational distance. Never set out to measure any of these things anyway unless I'm using my CA.
I would have a major effect on how I train instructors.
Paul Arden
The reason the casting analyzer does not show translation is two fold. To much data to add that was of little relevance. Also that the amount of speed that translation could generate in and of itself is minimal without the rotational aspect of the stroke.
Frank
I would have a major effect on how I train instructors.
Paul Arden