PLEASE NOTE: This is the Archived Sexyloops Board from years 2004-2013.
Our active community is here: https://www.sexyloops.co.uk/theboard/
Our active community is here: https://www.sexyloops.co.uk/theboard/
Rod Database
-
- IB3 Member Level 1
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 12:54 am
- Contact:
Ben,
While there is space, I believe there is a an insurmountable problem with the term swing weight—it has no unambiguous definition.
For better or for worse, this term has been incorporated into the advertising hype of some rod manufacturers with the connotation that "less is always better." However, without a recognized scale and standardized method for making the measurement, one can generate "relative" values to prove almost anything.
I believe Torsten and Magnus have been looking into the concept, but I have heard of no definite conclusions. In any event, whatever they decide, I believe they will have to give it a new "unique" name and definition.
It would (could) be an interesting number to know, if we could ever decide exactly what was being measured (units?) and the significance of the number.
The situation is also complicated by the fact that the measurement will me made on the rod itself, but the presence of the required reel for fishing changes everything.
Bill
Any chance of adding a column for swing weight too?
Ben, There's the possibility to add other data fields for sure.
While there is space, I believe there is a an insurmountable problem with the term swing weight—it has no unambiguous definition.
For better or for worse, this term has been incorporated into the advertising hype of some rod manufacturers with the connotation that "less is always better." However, without a recognized scale and standardized method for making the measurement, one can generate "relative" values to prove almost anything.
I believe Torsten and Magnus have been looking into the concept, but I have heard of no definite conclusions. In any event, whatever they decide, I believe they will have to give it a new "unique" name and definition.
It would (could) be an interesting number to know, if we could ever decide exactly what was being measured (units?) and the significance of the number.
The situation is also complicated by the fact that the measurement will me made on the rod itself, but the presence of the required reel for fishing changes everything.
Bill
- Magnus
- IB3 Member Level 1
- Posts: 12097
- Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2004 2:00 am
- Location: Banff, Scotland
- Contact:
without a recognized scale and standardized method for making the measurement, one can generate "relative" values to prove almost anything.
Steady on Bill we have a method.
....we can measure the overall mass and the balance point (BP) - this way we can determine the average mass density in front and behind the BP.
AMD1= delta m / delta x = (m_overall / 2) / x_BP
AMD2 = (m_overall / 2) / (length_rod - x_BP)
And a method of graphing the mass distribution of the whole rod http://www.sexyloops.co.uk/cgi-bin....;t=5214
Tosten christened that the Average Mass Density (AMD) and the units are g/m.
Yes the reel will impact on the swingweight of the outfit - it has no effect on the swingweight of the rod.
I've used the AMD of individual sections to look at the differences caused by rings - its a very sensitive, repeatable method.
Casting Definitions
"X-rays will prove to be a hoax."
"Radio has no future."
"Heavier than air flying machines are impossible."
Lord Kelvin
"X-rays will prove to be a hoax."
"Radio has no future."
"Heavier than air flying machines are impossible."
Lord Kelvin
- grunde
- Master of The Kettle
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 5:48 pm
- Location: Drammen, Norway
- Contact:
I noticed that. It's a bit of a problem for models with say a + in it's name
Grunde
Grunde
"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful."
George E. P. Box
Always question the assumptions!
Flycasting Definitions
...
George E. P. Box
Always question the assumptions!
Flycasting Definitions
...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 1 guest