Hi Tim, The build of the 770 has to be more robust to function at 30 feet. There is quite a bit of pressure difference between 10 and 30 feet. 30 feet is approaching 1 atmoshere. 14.7psi. All of the seals would have to be better. The crushproof feature is a result of a frame. The 790 doesn't have that. Richtmaisch wrote:Rich, could you expound on why you thought the 770 was a better fishing camera than the 790?
-Tim
PLEASE NOTE: This is the Archived Sexyloops Board from years 2004-2013.
Our active community is here: https://www.sexyloops.co.uk/theboard/
Our active community is here: https://www.sexyloops.co.uk/theboard/
Photos '06-'07
- Rich Knoles
- flybitch 2008
- Posts: 3137
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:40 pm
- Location: Michigan USA
- Contact:
- Rich Knoles
- flybitch 2008
- Posts: 3137
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:40 pm
- Location: Michigan USA
- Contact:
- blackwater
- IB3 Member Level 1
- Posts: 471
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 2:36 pm
- Contact:
Charlie, that is a standard Australian Cicada. The trout here don't eat the cicadas, it works the other way round. The cicadas pick the trout up just like a Sea Eagle does :pCharlie wrote:Either that is a MONSTER cicada or you have a very thin forearm?!
Charlie
All the cicada's i have seen around Melbourne or Victoria would be at least 3 inches long and maybe even a bit more.
Brian
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests